5/17/2023 0 Comments Lens studio review![]() The simpler lens design can’t correct every optical flaw. About Image QualityĪs said, the image quality of these relatively cheap primes is not as good as its expensive siblings. Since the primes I used are very small and lightweight, it would have been much more convenient and easy to use. I should have taken a small shoulder bag with me. Since you need to change lenses more often when using primes, the backpack is not ideal, no matter how convenient it may seem. The only downside of a backpack is the need to remove it from your back when changing lenses. It makes changing lenses much easier and quicker. The camera and three lenses fit inside this small bag. I took a backpack with me, but I should have chosen a simple shoulder bag. The maximum aperture of f/1.8 made the lens perfect for shooting inside the Sainte-Cecile Cathedral in the city of Albi or in the caves we’ve visited. It’s a focal length that works in most situations, no matter if it’s a landscape or a cityscape. The lens I used the most was the 35mm standard lens. Together with the high megapixel count of my Canon EOS R5, I had the ability to crop if the 85mm focal length turned out to be a bit too short. Both the 35mm and 85mm also offered the ability to shoot macro with a 1:2 magnification. With a 16mm, a 35mm, and a 85mm, I had a wide angle at my disposal, a standard lens, and a medium telephoto. This way, I could also use these lenses in less-than-ideal light circumstances without the need for a tripod. It would be easy to ask for two or three zoom lenses to cover a wider variety of focal lengths, but I wanted to carry a small set of primes because of the maximum aperture. There was a reason why I chose three primes. The RF 16mm f/2.8 STM, the RF 35mm f/1.8 IS STM macro, and the RF 85mm f/2 IS STM macro. The lens barrel often extends, and the materials used are of a lesser quality. The stepping motors used in these lenses produce much more noise, and they’re not that fast compared to the USM system. Reviews and test of these less expensive RF lenses show how you need a direct comparison with the higher-end lenses to see the difference, often only after detailed scrutiny.īut there are downsides to the less expensive RF lenses. Although the quality of these lenses is not as good as their L series siblings, the image quality is still very good. The Cheaper RF Lensesįortunately, Canon offers a more friendly priced set of lenses for the RF mount. Although it seems a good idea to invest in this expensive glass, chances are, you’re not getting the most out of these lenses. And if they do, they may not be the best choice. Not everyone that chooses the Canon EOS R series mirrorless cameras can afford these lenses. What about the cheaper versions? I borrowed this set from Canon for my Iceland trip in 2021. ![]() The prices of these lenses are also amazing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |